Your Message's
Priority
The guide below will vary of course with
the circumstances of the issue at hand, but it's a good
rough guide.
When you contact your legislators, be
aware that they and their staffers tend to "rank"
communiqués based on the format, and based on who you are.
This is not always fair or just - isn't an e-mail as serious
as a phone call? - but it is a political reality.
In order of MOST to LEAST effective,
these are the means of contacting legislators:
- personal visit to the legislator's
Springfield office or local office
- personally handwritten but LEGIBLE
short letter
- personally typewritten or
word-processed letter
- phone call to a key staffer in the
office
- phone call to the reception staffers in
the office
- personally written fax
- an obvious form letter or fax
- personally written e-mail
- an obvious form e-mail
In order of MOST to LEAST effective,
these are the kinds of people who contact legislators
- government officials
- constituent organizations or
corporations (entities in the legislator' home district)
- individual constituents (voters in the
legislator's home district)
- major international, national or
regional organizations or corporations
- little-known international, national or
regional organizations & corporations
- non-constituent individuals
Why to Not Send Postal Letters
Anymore
Because of the post-9/11 security issues, it can
take up to MONTHS for postal
mail and package delivery services to get through to
legislators and their staffs. All incoming mail and
parcels are subjected to thorough analysis for bombs,
poisons and biological agents like anthrax.

Where to Send Postal Letters If You Must
If you have some special reason to send postal
mail, despite the long delay that will be
experienced before it is received, then see the
instructions just below.
|
How to Visit in Person
Visiting your legislator in
person shows that you really care about on issue and are
very politically active (e.g. the kind of voter that might
help campaign for or against the legislator in the next
election...) It also lends weight to the issue - if it
wasn't vitally important to you, why would you visit in
person?
You should call the legislator's office to make an
appointment.
You should be prepared to explain why the issue matters to
you AND to everyone - most legislators will probably
initially presume you have a financial interest in the
outcome of the debate at hand, and may not at first
understand that your motives may be quite a bit broader.
Show them the public interest at stake.
It may be difficult to get to meet with the legislator
him/herself. If it just doesn't seem to be in the cards,
try to arrange a meeting with a key staffer such as the
technology policy issues staffer. Failing that, try to
meet with some other legislative assistant. It is part of
the job of these people to ensure that their boss
understands his/her constituents' viewpoints, and most of
them do a pretty good job at it.

Why
Contacting Policymakers Is Vital
On many
issues, your legislators and other elected officials
hear very little feedback from their constituents.
This is especially true of educational issues such
as you are probably interested in if you are reading
this.
Being contacted by even a few
voters is often enough to mold or shift a
policymaker's stance on an issue,
especially if they have not had much voter contact
on that issue before. Every letter, call and
visit counts. |
Important Notes
- While postal mail and faxes
that are obviously form letters are low on the
totem pole, action alerts often call for them, as
they are easy and fast and can produce a large
volume of response on an issue. Even if you are
presented with a prepared form letter, however,
please instead write your own if you have the
time. A form letter/fax is the minimum
action you should take.
- Even personally written e-mail
that does not look like a form letter is not
presently given much weight by most legislators,
partly because of unfamiliarity with the medium,
and partly because they cannot generally tell
whether you are a constituent or not. E-mail
should only be sent as an afterthought, a little
extra bit of action. And if you ARE a constituent,
say so in the first sentence and include your full
name, phone number and postal address as
"evidence".
- Personal visits are very
effective, but take time and effort, and you
should be prepared to answer questions. Know what
you are talking about. You do NOT need to be an
expert, just a reasonably informed and
concerned citizen able to articulate your views on
the matter you are visiting about - and what you
want the legislator to do.
- Phone calls to key staffers (or
actual legislators themselves) are usually
difficult to arrange. The staffers in charge of
answering the phone may be reluctant to put you
through to the upper-echelon staffers, unless they
know you are representing an organization or
corporation. It never hurts to ask. One tactic is
to call once and ask for the technology issues
staffer's name (for most issues this site is
concerned about, you'll be asking for this tech
staffer). Then call back later and ask for the
staffer by name. Be aware that this staffer is
both busy and probably more aware of the issues
than the general staff, so you may get either a
curt response, or at the other extreme, some
detailed questions or opinions. The same generally
goes for trying to speak to the legislator
personally - it doesn't hurt to ask, but you may
have to try several times, and be prepared to give
your message very clearly and quickly.
|

Dos and Don'ts
- If you
are a constituent, say so.
You are a constituent if you are in the State
Representative's or State Senator's district, for
example. Legislators pay 10 times more attention
to messages from constituents than from
non-constituents, because only constituents can
vote for (or against) them in the next election!
- If you represent (not
the same as "just work for") a corporation or
organization, you are better off writing/calling
in such a capacity, rather than as a "run of the
mill" voter, since legislators tend to perceive
organizational communiques as representing a
larger set of constituents - or more powerful
interests - than individuals' letters/calls,
generally speaking. This isn't a particularly
pleasant fact, but welcome to the PAC - and
lobbyist-infested US political system.
- Refer to legislation (including
bills, resolutions and amendments) by number
and title. It is also often good to mention
the primary sponsor, and the topic of the
legislation, as well as whether you think it
should be supported or opposed. This can usually
be accomplished in one short sentence, e.g. "I am
writing to urge you to oppose the "Destroy the
Internet Act" (H.R.27189, sponsored by Rep.
Yojimbo Doodah), a dangerous piece of
unconstitutional censorship legislation."
[This is just an example. No such
bill exists, though various Net censorship laws
are just about as bad.]
- It is usually a good idea to
follow up any letter, fax or e-mail with a phone
call.
- State YOUR position on the
issue (even if you "back it up" by noting that a
large organization has the same stance). Give
reasons (a good action alert should provide enough
material to do so.) If the legislator is doing
something right, commend them. If they are doing
something wrong, don't issue a condemnation of the
legislator; instead, firmly but politely ask for
their position or actions to change.
- Contact legislators regardless
of whether or not their known position is in
agreement with your own. If they do agree, your
contact serves to support them by letting them
know their constituents are behind them. If they
do not agree, your contact may help change their
minds.
- Silly things to avoid saying
when prefacing your comments: "I'm a voter" - of
course you are, or you wouldn't be politically
active enough to be calling or writing your
legislator - and, "I'm a taxpayer" - of course you
are; we all are. These phrases are not useful, and
most staffers have heard them so many times
they'll just roll their eyes and probably lose
attention. Instead say, "I'm a constituent", or
(if you are) "I'm a supporter of [the legislator's
name here]".
- Don't assume that the
legislator him/herself will actually read your
message. Almost all communications to policymakers
are "filtered" through staffers who tally up
voters' pro and con opinions on issues. They do
this quickly and often simply making assumptions
about what you mean if you are not clear.
- Therefore, be very clear
about what you mean and what action and/or
position you want the legislator to take, and
keep it short. It is good to finish your
communication with a one-sentence summary that
clearly indicates your stance on the issue, what
the issue is, and what the legislator should do.
- When communicating with
legislators and their staffers, or any other
government officials, please remember to be
POLITE. Rude language and manners, disrespect,
accusations, or hostility are likely to cause your
message to be completely disregarded as the
ramblings of a crank. You want to sound
self-possessed, confident, reasonable, and alert.
NEVER make threats, no matter how bad a
piece of legislation is. And, of course,
don't curse-n-swear at the targets of your letters
and calls.
- DO finish your letter with an
indication that you would appreciate a direct
response or at least the issuance of some kind of
statement on the issue, if not a personal reply.
You can do this by saying something like "I would
appreciate hearing your position on this issue"
right after your 1-sentence summary at the end.
- When passing on an e-mailed
action alert to other people do not modify it.
Especially refrain from removing cut-off date or
the contact information of the organization (s)
issuing the alert. Avoid modifying in any way an
action alert that bears a PGP or other digital
signature, as doing so will invalidate the
signature. If you want to add some kind of
comment, do so at the top, ABOVE any digital
signature headers.
|
 |